With the upcoming release of the latest movie in The Hunger Games series, Sunrise on the Reaping, I think the enthusiastic culture of the dedicated fans replicates the behaviours of the series’ most notorious ruling class.
The Hunger Games is a dystopian book-to-movie adaptation series by author Suzanne Collins. It takes place in a highly classist, futuristic North America where social mobility is nearly impossible, and the wealth disparity is staggering. To punish the oppressed class, the districts, for an uprising, the ruling class, the Capitol, holds an annual event called the Hunger Games.
One boy and one girl between the ages of 12 and 18 from each district, region in the nation, are raffled to fight to the death in a televised show until there is one survivor. The children selected to fight in an arena, a confined, stylized warzone, are tributes.
The event is livestreamed. District citizens are forced to watch. Capitol citizens celebrate the Games like it's their favourite sports event.
Comparisons between our society and the dystopia have been a topic of online discourse since The Hunger Games first premiered in 2012. A viral post said that the user’s theatre erupted into cheers when one tribute killed another. It began a larger online conversation about the hypothetical normalization of an atrocious event like the Hunger Games in our society.
Capitol citizens’ interaction with the Games and their impact on the potential outcome gamified the slaughter. Tributes became pawns. Extravagant themed arenas made the Games exciting. The mentors, hair, makeup, and costumes are all distractions; they maintain the show. Capitol citizens don’t question why the Games persist generations after the initial uprising, sympathize with the districts or humanize the tributes. Keeping the Games entertaining is essential to maintaining the oppressive government.
It is undeniable that real people replicate the actions of Capitol citizens when engaging with the franchise. They dress up like characters for Halloween or parties. Online posts show The Hunger Games watch parties with themed foods and drinks and Hunger Games-themed birthdays referencing Quarter Quells, where the Games include a surprise element every 25 years. One fan posted on TikTok that she makes miniatures of the arenas based on the information she has gathered about them in the books and movies. She also keeps track of the victors, if stated.
There are highly detailed online discussions of the Gamemakers' and the Capitol's decisions. Some of these details may inform specific pain points of characters which impact and give nuance to rebellion efforts. However, it’s a gray area, and some, I feel, wander too far.
The point of the franchise is to spark larger political conversations.
The Hunger Games has proven to be a great basis for discussing deep, complex topics. By relating power struggles and systems of oppression to a fictional world it creates distance making conversations less overwhelming.
The franchise retains its relevance through universal human nature and familiar political agendas. It is very important media. It is both entertainment and a tool. But if people are not reading or watching The Hunger Games and having deeper thoughts about society and power structures, they are missing the point.
The central theme is that distraction works. The Hunger Games teaches us to question and challenge information and authority. But Collins is also telling us that in the process of questioning others to question ourselves.
You may not agree with me, but ask yourself why.
